The use of enzyme-linked immunoassay (ELISA) for the detection of proteins (antigens or antibodies) is one the most readily available diagnostic tools worldwide and is heavily used today in swine production medicine. The test is commonly used in surveillance and disease monitoring as well as a diagnostic tool. As swine veterinarians use this tool often, it is critical to understand how the assay works, what it is detecting, and its advantages and disadvantages when interpreting results. It is also important to remember that although the same technology is being used for different pathogens, there should be differences in how these results are interpreted.
The ELISA assays are designed for the detection of antigens or antibodies against bacteria or viruses. Antigens are foreign proteins that stimulate antibody production (antigen = antibody generator). When thinking about antibodies, always think they are against proteins. In designing the assay, the manufacturer or laboratory decides what specific protein or proteins they want to target. If the ELISA is targeting the protein directly on the bacteria or virus, they are then called an antigen ELISA, whereas if the target is the animal’s antibody response to the bacteria or virus it is referred to as an antibody ELISA. Although there are ELISA assays designed to target only one or two proteins (antibodies or antigens), many actually target a large number of proteins. The assays can also be designed to detect a specific type of antibody response (IgG, IgM, or IgA) or a combination of these. Each of these types of antibodies has specific functions which are not part of the scope of this article.
The concept and process for antibody or antigen detection by ELISA are exactly the same. It starts with obtaining the targeted protein (antigen or antibody). For single proteins, there is a need for a separate process for obtaining a purified concentration of this single protein. Identifying which protein or proteins to target is a scientific and complex process. Ideally, the assay targets a single protein that is unique to the pathogen of concern (does not cross react with other pathogens), highly immunogenic (for antibody detection) or found in high concentrations (for antigen detection); it targets a protein which is known to be highly correlated to protection against disease, and always present. Unfortunately, many of these criteria are unknown and this single protein, which can be easily produced and found in the sample, or a mixture of multiple proteins (i.e. whole virus or bacteria) is often used instead. Although using whole viruses or bacteria as the target proteins can be easy, there are many opportunities for cross reactions with other pathogens.
There are the general steps to the process (See Figure 1).
In the case of a competitive ELISA, the key point is that the process used will actually produce the opposite result (see Figure 2B). The sample and a known amount of labeled antigen (for antigen detection) or antibodies (for antibody detection) are added to the sample to be evaluated so that once they are added to the labeled wells, both the original sample and the added labeled proteins (antibodies or antigen) compete on attaching to the pre-coated plate well. In essence, if there are no targeted proteins in the sample to be tested, then all the labeled proteins will be able to attach to the plate and create a strong color change. On the other hand, if there is a considerable number of targeted proteins in the sample, the proteins from the sample will work to outcompete (block out) the labeled proteins from attaching. When the sample is washed, any labeled proteins not attached will be removed by washing. So the more antigens or antibodies in the sample, the more they will block out the labeled proteins which results in them being unattached and washed out. This results in a low absorbance when the concentration of targeted proteins is high in the sample which is the opposite from the previous case. High values suggest low concentration or negative result and makes it impossible to quantify the antigen/antibody concentration of positive samples.
The assay cutoff for each ELISA assay can be different and is pre-established by the manufacturer based on their desired targeted sensitivity and specificity. For a direct, indirect, or sandwich ELISA, any number higher than the cutoff is considered positive. For a competitive ELISA, any number higher than the cutoff is considered negative. For some assays, they also establish a gray zone to classify samples as “suspect” since the assay tends to have some “background” reactions (cross-reactions) that make it difficult to have a clear cutoff point.
Results are usually, but not always, reported as a corrected S:P or sample to positive ratio which is corrected to background color change found in the negative control wells. Often antibody levels are referred to as “titers.” Although this is technically not correct, it can be justified from a big picture perspective. A key point is that when speaking about titers there is a direct mathematical relationship between values (a value of 20 has twice as many antibodies as a sample with a value of 10). With ELISA values, this direct mathematical relationship does not exist (See figure 2A). An ELISA of 2.0 does have significantly more antibodies than, and not just twice as many antibodies as a value of 1.0.
Because ELISA assays are concentration dependent (directly correlate to concentration of targeted protein [antibody or antigen]) pooling for testing is strongly discouraged. Pooling can significantly increase the likelihood of missing a positive sample.